When it comes to comparative thinking, it is basically the following state: The target for this month is 1 million, and the current business situation is 800,000. Whatsapp Database Through the comparison of the two, it is concluded that the target Whatsapp Database has not been reached, and the target is still 200,000, and the completion rate is 80%. Better add some year-on-year data, and a so-called comparative analysis is complete. If comparative thinking is so simple, is there a need for a data analyst job.
It is estimated that data analysts are now out of Whatsapp Database work, right? It only takes 5 seconds for business people to learn this method, and what about data analysts. The above case can only be regarded as the simplest method in the comparison method - ratio size. Whatsapp Database The work done is to convert the data into a conclusion, that is, from the data of 800,000 to the conclusion that "the target is not reached". Although the conclusions are easier to remember and understand than the data, it is difficult to draw some deeper information than the size. In addition to "comparison to size", what are the more advanced methods of comparative .
Thinking? Today I will take you to explore Whatsapp Database what is going on in contrastive thinking. In the article on low-level thinking in Module 1, I introduced logical thinking. The most basic of logical thinking is induction. In the previous article, I just briefly Whatsapp Database introduced the induction method, and today we introduce a more systematic induction method - Muller's five method. Mill's five methods are the five inductive methods used by the British philosopher Mill to determine the causal connection of phenomena, namely, the method of seeking common ground, the method of seeking differences,